Facebook Icon Twitter Icon YouTube Icon Google Plus Icon LinkedIn Icon

The Truth: C.R. Bard Knew Their IVC Filters Weren’t Safe

May 11th, 2016 Defective Products
Harmed by a C.R. Bard IVC filter? File an IVC filter lawsuit claim for medical negligence.

Evidence continues to mount that manufacturer C.R. Bard knew about the potential risks and harmful side effects associated with retractable IVC filters. Yet, the retractable IVC filters were marketed and sold as a safe and effective treatment option while cases of serious complications, and even deaths, became more and more common in the news.

If you or a loved experienced complications with a C.R. Bard IVC filter and are considered filing an IVC filter lawsuit, an attorney experienced in similar cases is an invaluable resource in helping you understand your legal options.

How C.R. Bard’s IVC Filters Fail

Designed to keep blood clots from traveling to the heart, IVC filters are placed in a large vein, the inferior vena cava (IVC). These metal filters, introduced by C.R. Bard in 2003, were marketed as a solution for people at risk for blood clots or strokes, but for various reasons were not medically able to take prescription blood thinner medications.

C.R. Bard isn’t the only manufacturer of this type of filter, but they have been singled out in IVC filter lawsuits due to reports of unethical and negligent behavior in getting FDA approval for their products. More than two dozen deaths, in addition to hundreds of non-fatal but serious complications, appear to be directly attributable to C.R. Bard’s continued negligence.

Growing Medical Risk

After reported deaths and injuries were initially investigated, it was found that an astonishing one-quarter of the Recovery brand of C.R. Bard IVC filters used in these cases had split or broken off in the patient’s vein. This caused smaller pieces to float free and travel to other parts of the body, where in some cases the pieces punctured the heart and other vital organs. Other cases involved a massive blood clot pushing the entire IVC device into the heart – much like a faulty dam giving way and becoming part of the damaging debris.

The Evidence Against C.R. Bard

Damning information uncovered in legal investigations relating to IVC filter lawsuit indicates that C.R. Bard was actually denied FDA approval for its Recovery IVC device in 2002 because of potential health risks. Rather than halt production and fix those problems, C.R. Bard appears to have forged the signature of a regulation specialist it had hired, according to that specialist. She has since testified that she did not consider C.R. Bard IVC filters safe and would not have supported a second application to the FDA.

Even more alarming are C.R. Bard’s actions once the IVC filters were approved and subsequently released into the market. As early as 2004, the company hired a consultant to look at the reports of serious side effects and deaths that were occurring in people who had the devices implanted.

Yet, C.R. Bard never alerted the public, or any of the appropriate state and federal health agencies. Instead, it quietly upgraded to a somewhat safer alternative while still selling more than 34,000 of the problematic IVC filters without providing any warning or aftercare.

Filing an IVC Filter Lawsuit

The physical, mental, and financial ramifications of faulty C.R. Bard IVC filters cannot be overstated. Here are a few things to consider if you are deciding whether to file an IVC filter lawsuit claim:

  • There have been cases of heart, brain, liver, and lung perforations from IVC filters.
  • It may be too dangerous to have broken IVC filter pieces removed from vital organs, leaving you to cope with the possibility of experiencing life-threatening medical issues.
  • IVC filter failure can cause severe abdominal distress, vomiting, chills, fever, internal hemorrhaging, and severe and unrelenting pain.
  • Since 2014, dozens of C.R. Bard IVC filter lawsuits have been filed, so you are not alone.

Have you experience perforation, migration, or any other complications related to a faulty retractable IVC filter? You could be eligible for compensation from your IVC filter’s manufacturer for risking your health. If you are ready to file an IVC filter lawsuit claim, contact Nolan Caddell Reynolds today at 866-242-0452 for a free consultation.

Typically I don’t leave much feedback for services rendered, however, in this particular case I think everyone needs to know about my experience with Caddell Reynolds. I have used various attorneys throughout my adulthood for various reasons. Recently I retained an attorney, Joel Hargis, from this firm. If anybody is just satisfied with meeting expectations you need to consider this firm for exceeding expectations. This attorney and his staff far exceeded any expectations I had at the onset. Tammy was amazing in making me feel comfortable with the various entries and documentation needed. Mandy goes above and beyond in being responsive to questions and needs. An example which has never happened to me before with any law firm, was I sent an email late Saturday night requesting an appointment and information and on Sunday I got a response back. What law firm does that? Never in my experience has that ever happened to me. Joel is absolutely amazing. He doesn’t circumvent the law he explains the law that any novice can understand. He left no doubt in my mind of his knowledge, his experience, his attention to detail, and his overall diligence in making sure that I was going to be represented in a manner that my confidence level in my particular case went up 150%. I very much recommend this law firm and if the rest of their legal team is as good as the one I retained within this firm they will go far in servicing any client that needs representation. Amazing and astounding don’t really define or describe how I feel. One word comes to mind, indescribable!

John T